New: Bertucci A-1R Ultralight Field Watch

As much as we appreciate the high-tech navigation and communication capabilities of smart watches, they certainly have their trade-offs. They're large and heavy on the wrist, potentially fragile, dependent on frequent battery charging, and (most notably) very expensive. If all you need is the ability to tell time, a simple analog watch is a great way to go. Specifically, we're fans of field watches. This genre was inspired by classic military designs with easy-to-read markings, slim cases, and replaceable NATO bands.

Bertucci offers a wide range of field watches, such as this A-2TR Vintage GMT.

Bertucci is one watchmaker that specializes in analog field watches — we've written in-depth reviews of a few of the company's models in the past. This week at the Outdoor Retailer show in Denver, a new entry-level model was released: the Bertucci A-1R. At a $55 MSRP, it's certainly not going to break the bank, but it comes with some appealing features for outdoor use.

The new A-1R is based on a 36mm fiber-reinforced polycarbonate Unibody case that weighs just 1.6 ounces. It has integrated solid lug bars, so the watch band runs over the bars and underneath the body without the need for spring bars or pins. This makes swapping out the band extremely simple — a Comfort-Webb nylon-blend band is included, but Bertucci offers a huge variety of interchangeable nylon and leather bands that will fit the watch.

The A-1R features a Japanese quartz movement, hardened mineral crystal, and push-in crown at the 4:00 position. The hands and markers are equipped with a Swiss super-luminous coating for nighttime visibility. Water resistance is 50M, expected battery life is 3 years.

If you'd prefer a steel case instead of lightweight polycarbonate, Bertucci offers the virtually-identical A-1S model for $95.

The A-1R goes on sale in August. For more info on the new Bertucci A-1R once it is released, go to Bertucciwatches.com.


Review: TOPS Knives SXB Survival Knife

Photos by John Schwartze

Imagine yourself in a no-sh*t survival situation and the knife in your hands is rusted, bent at the hilt, and the edge is chipped to hell. Any experienced blade snob will tell you it’s useless and you may injure yourself trying to use it. But is there any truth to that assumption? Maybe it became that way because you were lost in the woods and found it like that. Maybe you inadvertently damaged it. Or maybe any number of unpredictable scenarios left you with a knife that’d seen better days. Whatever the case, let’s just say this is the only tool you have to depend on in an outdoor survival situation. You need a cutting implement to create firewood, build a shelter, defend yourself, filet fish, and perform other tasks. So the question is, how do you survive with a damaged knife? Will it still perform?

the tops xsb in a tree stump

I was curious about that myself and decided to torture test a knife to see how well it’d perform some of these tasks. What better test subject than a $300 TOPS Knives SXB — EJ Snyder’s Skullcrusher X-Treme Blade. Now, here’s the problem I have with knife reviews — a great many of them seem to be the same and don’t involve any substantial use. The manufacturer sends the reviewer a badass, ultra-sharp, brand-new knife, and guess what? They all work great. Imagine that, a brand-new knife sent by a company to a reviewer who wouldn’t ordinarily be able to afford the knife thinks it works great. It does everything! It slices, dices, chops, feathers, and notches. By golly, nothing negative to say about the knife and the reviewer almost always gets to keep the knife, and wouldn’t you know it, it’s still in pristine condition.

Many of the designs coming out these days are very similar, and the Skullcrusher looks very familiar, like Tom Brown Jr.’s squabble with Beck knives over the movie The Hunted familiar. When I first saw this knife, I thought it was the most bat-sh*t insane-looking knife I’d ever seen. It weighs almost 2 pounds and is massive. This thing looked like it would cut and kill everything! And then I thought, of course it will — it’s heavy, sharp, and brand new. But what if it were jacked up? Rusted, chipped, bent … how well would it work then?

a very used tops knives xsb

Humans have to endure survival situations with the odds stacked against them all the time — and EJ had to do it naked (see our interview in Issue 24 of this magazine). When you go into a tough situation, your gear has to hold up to your pace; otherwise you might be screwed. Of course, a brand-new knife is the best for a survival situation, but since nothing is ideal in real survival, I set out to take this knife and beat the ever-living hell out of it — and then test it out. Oh boy, a guiltless little pleasure, to take a free knife and do whatever you want with it. Have you ever thrown a $300 knife at a target and watched it bounce off a rock?

Torturing the Test Subject

a man throwing a tops knives xsb

Above: We wanted to see how well a damaged knife would perform normal tasks after it was deliberately banged up. We simulated this by throwing it at a tree trunk.

One of the most destructive things you can do to a knife is throw it. Let’s face it, the idea of knife throwing is cool as hell, but it’s also highly impractical. Most knives aren't made for throwing, and those that are are typically intended to be disposable. But it’s lots of fun and a great way to jack your knife up for an unorthodox gear review! Twenty throws in, most stuck to the trunk of a tree with a few bounces. Ultimately, the knife did what one might expect — bent from the hilt.

a tops xsb bent after heavy use

Above: As you can see, it didn't take long for us to significantly bend the blade, because all that energy has to go somewhere. Now let's see if it'll continue to perform the other tasks a survival situation may call for.

Keep in mind, I have yet to see a knife that didn’t bend with this kind of abuse. If you ever watch slow-motion video of a handle of a knife once it’s stuck, the handle wiggles a lot on impact — hence the bending at the hilt. All that energy has to go somewhere, and it completely throws the blade off kilter. The throwing and bouncing also produced a few nice chips in the blade, which came by way of hitting rocks and hard surfaces. Then, I left it outside in the rain for a few days … just because. So after a massive amount of throws, abuse, and complete disrespect, it was time to put
it to the test.

the XSB in a tree stump

Above: No knife is really designed to withstand this kind of punishment and we're by no means recommending you use your own knife this way.

Does it Still Work?

Last summer, I took the family camping in the Sierra mountains, and we collected firewood off the ground. I brought my Gränsfors Bruk hatchet to compare with the Tops Skullcrusher SXB. Typically, I’d choose to carry a hatchet rather than a large knife any day of the week. Generally speaking, a hatchet’s lighter, better at cutting, and with practice can be used like a knife for chopping, feathering, and notching. I use it to clean trout all the time. Finally, a hatchet can break down a tree with less effort than a usual knife. Not the Skullcrusher though!

the Tops SXB chopping wood

Above: Even though the blade was bent and the edge was chipped, the SXB was still able to chop through old logs and remove tree limbs with ease.

Keep in mind, the comparison was between a razor-sharp GB hatchet and a bent, chipped, and dulled SXB. Before I start raving about this knife’s performance, I must say that I began this test with apprehension. After all, my initial impressions were that it was an eccentric tacticool blade and ridiculously impractical. However, it looks like ol’ EJ has some Ranger tricks up his sleeve that this Marine wasn’t prepared for. In fact, when I received the knife, I immediately did a live video in which I called out EJ. Being the good sport that he was, he said, “Challenge accepted, brother.”

The XSB processing wood

Above: The blade's edge remained sharp and feathered with no problem. So far, we're impressed.

During the camping trip, I tested the knife by de-limbing branches of trees, batoning wood to split, hacking away at logs, and overall generally abusing a knife for a standard camping trip and backwoods survival situation. Throughout these tasks, I couldn’t believe what I was seeing and feeling. The knife has an industry-standard Micarta handle, and I loved the grip style, called Rocky Mountain Tread. It didn’t cut up my hands, provided a great grip, and really stuck to my gloves well, allowing fantastic control.

Above: The sawback on the spine was able to cut through logs and branches with ease.

The batoning test worked as I figured it would. As many of you know, batoning isn’t just a function of the blade, but the force at which you baton. Some blades that are lightweight have a tougher time making it through. The heaviness of the SXB, regardless of its condition, worked very well, making its way down the grain. While knots are usually detrimental to the blade, it made short work of them too. My preferred technique for batoning is to keep the hilt of the blade close to the edge of the log and to point the handle in a slight downward direction, to maintain control of the blade going down the log as you strike it with a baton. The SXB’s blade is so large that you can attack wider logs that wouldn’t be possible with other knives. A downed pine tree served as the test for de-limbing purposes. It’s easy to clear branches and limbs when you have a sharp knife. With the weight of the beat-up SXB, it only took one to two chops on branches thicker than 2 inches in diameter.

Above: Notching was another task the damaged SXB tackled with no problems. Shucks, we're really starting to admire this knife.

The last test I performed was to cut through a dry tree with both the GB hatchet and SXB. I went at it the usual way — cross strikes to create a V shape in the log and working around the cut for a 180-degree V. The hatchet did a quicker job than the knife, but I feel I put in a similar amount of work, with the hatchet being just slightly more efficient that the SXB, but not by much. In all fairness, the hatchet was designed for this type of work. So it’s impressive that the SXB functioned as well as it did.

Spine of the heavily used Tops Knives XSB

Final Thoughts

My initial assumptions about the knife were both wrong and correct. Correct in that it’s indeed a bat-sh*t crazy knife — but it’s a very useful, durable bat-sh*t crazy knife. I abused the hell out of it, yet the blade stood up. It chipped a little, but not much, and still managed to make short work of tasks. Some may question my methods and techniques, and that’s fine. Although deliberately abused, I have a knife I can still use and knowing its capabilities means more to me than a pristine, free knife. Frankly, I feel this is the best way to test equipment — see how it'd hold up after sh*t hits the fan. I only trust those who go through hell with me and come back standing, so why shouldn’t I think the same with my gear? Great knife, EJ! Your challenger proved to be a worthy opponent.

A heavily used Tops Knives XSB

TOPS Knives SXB Specifications

Blade Steel
1095 RC 56-58

Handle Material
Black linen Micarta

OAL
15.75 inches

Blade Length
9.38 inches

Blade Thickness
0.25 inch

Weight
26 ounces

MSRP
$310

URL
www.topsknives.com

About The Author

 

Brady Pesola is an out-of-the-box style writer and tester when it comes to gear reviews. As a former Marine, he’s frank and to the point but writes with fairness and integrity. Brady teaches outdoor education in San Diego and is working on redefining the way survival is taught and viewed. He also runs a non-profit focused on getting veterans outdoors. sandiegosos.com

More From Issue 32

Don’t miss essential survival insights—sign up for Recoil Offgrid's free newsletter today!

Read articles from the next issue of Recoil Offgrid: Issue 33

Read articles from the previous issue of Recoil Offgrid: Issue 31

Check out our other publications on the web: Recoil | Gun Digest | Blade | RecoilTV | RECOILtv (YouTube)

Editor's Note: This article has been modified from its original version for the web.


Poll: What 10 Items Would Make Your “ALONE” Survival Gear List?

Like many of you, we've been following the ALONE TV series on History for a few years now. Although no reality show will allow you to feel the stress of a real survival situation, ALONE is certainly one of the better examples we've seen in this genre. Each of the 10 contestants endures isolation, exhaustion, and the onset of starvation in an effort to outlast the others and claim the $500,000 prize. Season 6 takes place in the Canadian Arctic near the shores of Great Slave Lake.

Great Slave Lake is the deepest lake in North America and the tenth largest in the world. (Photo: Google)

We've often discussed the physical and mental challenges associated with survival in adverse conditions, but gear is a critical variable as well. When you have limited resources, you'll be forced to rely more on the items you do have in order to build a shelter, start a fire, purify water, and scavenge or hunt for food. ALONE contestants must choose only 10 items from a pre-approved, highly-specific gear list. These do not include the required camera gear — since each contestant films themselves as they survive — or clothing, personal effects, and safety/rescue equipment (more details on this below).

Today, we'll take a look at the gear options that are available to ALONE contestants, and allow you to choose your own hypothetical 10-item loadout in a poll. Once you've completed the poll, you'll be able to compare your survival gear picks to those of others who read this article. Finally, we'll close with a breakdown of the items that were most popular among the 10 participants on ALONE Season 6. This information may help you re-evaluate which tools and resources are most important, and which might not deserve a place in your pack.

Exempt Items

As we mentioned, contestants on the show were allowed some clothing to withstand the cold Arctic weather, as well as a few personal items, safety items, and camera gear. This gear doesn't count towards the 10-item loadout, but it's fairly limited for a survival scenario that might last for several months. Here's the complete list of “freebie” items received by all contestants:

Items such as a rain shell, brimmed hat, and neck gaiter help contestants stay warm and dry. (Photo: History Channel)

Clothing

  • Hunting boots – 1 pair
  • Waterproof winter boots – 1 pair
  • Gaiters – 1 pair
  • Short-sleeved T-shirt
  • Fleece or wool shirt with optional hood
  • Wool sweaters – 2
  • Wool socks – 6 pairs
  • Wool, fur, or brimmed hats – 2
  • Buffs or neck gaiters – 2
  • Shemagh or scarf
  • Gloves – 4 pairs (1 insulated, 1 leather work-style glove, 1 overmitt, 1 thin glove liner)
  • Underwear/briefs – 2 pairs
  • Insulated parka-style jacket with hood
  • Outdoor pants or bibs – 2 pairs
  • Insulated, waterproof winter pants or bibs – 1 pair
  • Uninsulated, waterproof rain jacket
  • Long thermal underwear – 2 pairs (incl. top and bottom)
  • Leather or synthetic belt

Personal Effects

  • Toothbrush – 1
  • Eyeglasses – 1 pair (proof of prescription required)
  • 4×6 one-sided personal photo – 1

Safety and Camera Gear
Though not explicitly mentioned by producers on the Season 6 web page, it appears that all contestants are supplied with some default items. These are designed to enable them to film their experience safely, call for rescue reliably, and stay alive until rescuers arrive if they're severely injured. Much of this comes down to reducing liability, since the show's producers don't want anyone to actually die during the competition.

Contestants are required to film themselves as they survive. (Photo: History Channel)

In previous years, this category has consisted of the following gear:

  • Camera equipment (cameras, mounts, batteries, etc.) and storage case
  • Backpack
  • Rules and regulations guide
  • Animal attack prevention tools (i.e. bear spray and air horn)
  • Emergency signal flare and small signal mirror (for increased visibility during rescue)
  • Satellite phone and GPS tracking beacon
  • Emergency personal flotation device
  • First aid / trauma kit (tourniquet, gauze, bandages, rubbing alcohol, etc.)
  • 20×20 canvas tarp
  • 10×10 tarp for protecting camera equipment
  • Headlamp
  • Emergency rations pack to include water and food (cannot be used unless tapping out)

All contestants are provided with GPS beacons and sat phones to be used when they tap out.

Approved Survival Items

According to the rules, ALONE contestants get to choose exactly 10 items from the following gear list. There's also a stipulation that only two of these items can be food, so you can't just go into hibernation inside a fort made of beef jerky and wait for everyone else to tap out. No duplicate items are allowed, so you can't take three gill nets to increase your odds of catching some fish.

Here's the list, broken down into the appropriate categories. We omitted some of the more detailed specifications on some items for the sake of brevity, but you can read the extended version on History's web site. Look over these items, and consider which ones you'd pick — keep in mind that this particular scenario occurs in the Arctic, so cold temperatures and harsh weather will be a serious threat.

Shelter

Rope or cord comes in handy for anything from rigging an A-frame shelter to rappelling down a mountainside.

  • 12×12 ground sheet tarp with grommets (Remember that a 20×20 tarp is provided by default, this tarp is for additional ground cover.)
  • 8mm climbing rope – 10 meters
  • Mil-spec 550 paracord (no Fire Cord or other specialty versions) – 80 meters
  • 3mm non-waxed cotton cord – 40 meters

Bedding

Surviving in the Arctic without a way to stay warm and dry at night would be a serious challenge.

  • Multi-season sleeping bag
  • Waterproof bivy bag (sleeping bag cover)
  • Sleeping pad
  • Hammock

Cooking

A pot offers a way to cook food as well as boil water.

  • Large pot with lid (2 quarts max)
  • Steel frying pan
  • Canteen or water bottle
  • Enamel food bowl
  • Spoon

Hygiene

Soap is something we use every day, but would it be one of the 10 items you choose?

  • Bar of soap
  • Small bottle of shower soap
  • Toothpaste – 8 ounces
  • Dental floss – 40 mm roll
  • Shaving razor with blade
  • Comb
  • Face flannel
  • 30 by 60-inch towel

Hunting

Slingshots are not just kids' toys. When powered with modern bands, they're capable of dropping small game quietly with lead rounds, steel shot, or small pebbles.

No hunting rifles or fancy compound bows are allowed, only slingshots and primitive bows.

  • Fishing kit – 300 yards of 25-pound test mono-filament line and 25 barbless hooks (no lures)
  • Gill net – 5-inch mesh openings, 12 feet long by 50 inches wide
  • Primitive recurve or longbow with 9 arrows (broadhead, bodkin head, or blunt tip)
  • Slingshot with 30 ball bearings and one spare band
  • Snare wire – 3.5 pounds of 20/21-gauge wire
  • Salt block – 3 pounds
  • Net foraging bag

Food (2 Items Max)

Hardtack is one of the simple, long-lasting survival foods contestants can choose.

  • Beef jerky – 2 pounds
  • Biltong (dried meat) – 2 pounds
  • Pemmican – 2 pounds
  • Dried pulses/legumes/lentils – 2 pounds
  • Hardtack biscuits – 2 pounds
  • GORP trail mix (raisins, m&m's and peanuts) – 2 pounds
  • Chocolate – 2 pounds
  • Flour – 1 pound
  • 1/3 pound of rice, 1/3 pound of sugar, 1/3 pound of salt

Tools

You won't get far without some sharp tool for breaking down wood — but there are several to choose from.

  • Ferro rod set with striker
  • Hatchet
  • Saw
  • Ax
  • Small shovel
  • Hunting knife (10-inch blade max, no secondary functions)
  • Pocket knife
  • Leatherman multi-tool
  • Sharpening stone
  • Duct tape or electrical tape – 1 roll
  • Sewing kit – 6 needles, 2 bobbins of thread, 3-inch scissors, 5-inch awl, 1-inch beeswax cube, small carrying pouch
  • Carabiner
  • LED flashlight
  • Crampons/ice cleats

Poll: Pick Your Gear

Complete the polls below to let us know what your gear loadout would consist of. We've broken it down into sections as seen above, so select the items (if any) you'd choose in that section and hit the “vote” button at the end of each category. Be sure to select only the 10 items you'd choose if you were actually participating in the Arctic survival scenario as seen on ALONE Season 6.

What the Contestants Picked

Now that you've voted for the 10 items you'd select and seen how other readers voted in our poll, let's take a look at what the actual contestants on ALONE Season 6 took with them into the Arctic. We'll list the gear below in descending order based on the number of people who selected it.

10 of 10

  • Sleeping bag – Unsurprisingly, all contestants chose this item. It'd be difficult to survive in the Arctic without an insulated sleeping bag for one night, much less weeks or months.
  • Fishing kit – Considering the need for a reliable source of calories, and the proximity to a large body of water, all contestants included fishing line and hooks in their loadouts.

9 of 10

  • Large pot – Jordan was the only contestant who didn't pick this item. He chose the frying pan instead.
  • Ferro rod and striker – Every contestant except for Nathan chose this reliable means of starting a fire. His kit didn't include a dedicated fire-starter; instead, he relied on his experience with the bow drill fire-starting method.
  • Saw – Nathan was the only contestant who didn't bring a saw, opting instead for an ax, fixed-blade knife, and pocket knife.

8 of 10

  • Paracord – Ray and Brady didn't choose this item, or any other form of cordage (aside from the line in their fishing kits).
  • Bow and arrows – Brady and Michelle didn't select this method of hunting. Both chose to pursue small game with snare wire instead.
  • Ax – Everyone except Barry and Woniya chose the ax as a means of chopping wood for their fires and shelters.

7 of 10

  • Knife – Jordan, Brady, and Michelle were the only ones who didn't include a fixed-blade hunting knife in their cutting tool arsenal.

Most of the contestants brought a fixed-blade knife, as well as several other cutting tools.

6 of 10

  • Snare wire – Tim, Nathan, Donny, and Woniya skipped this item as a secondary means of hunting.

5 of 10

  • Primary food ration – Half the contestants (Nathan, Donny, Brady, Woniya, Michelle) brought a food item from the approved list. One of them (Brady) also brought a second food item.
  • Multi-tool – Half the contestants (Jordan, Ray, Brady, Woniya, and Michelle) also picked a multi-tool, which can be used for precise cutting, sawing, drilling, and various other tasks.

1 of 10

  • Ground sheet tarp – Only Barry chose this for the base of his shelter. Other contestants relied entirely on the default green tarp and natural materials.
  • Frying pan – Rather than a pot, Jordan chose a frying pan for cooking/boiling.
  • Gill net – In previous years, the gill net was a more popular choice. Surprisingly, only Nathan selected it this year.
  • Secondary food ration – Barry was the only contestant who selected the maximum allowance of two food items. While this offers a considerable stockpile of calories, it also limited him to only eight other pieces of gear.
  • Pocket knife – Nathan brought this tool, while others relied on a multi-tool and/or larger cutting tools.
  • Shovel – Tim was the only contestant to bring a shovel, stating that he wanted it for breaking ice and digging up clay for pottery. He also brought an ax, knife, and saw.

Closing Thoughts

If you're thinking that most of these gear choices were unsurprising, you're probably already on the right track with your emergency gear. Even if you're not an experienced survivalist, you should know why no one chose the comb, 2-pound block of chocolate, or single carabiner as one of their 10 allotted items.

That said, examining this gear list and the choices of the contestants should get you thinking more seriously about the value of your own gear choices. If your picks don't match up to those of other readers or the ALONE contestants, there could easily be a valid reason, but you should be able to articulate it.

Fortunately, in a real survival scenario, you probably won't be restricted to only 10 items. You'll have whatever you had the forethought to bring along. If you prepare the gear you know you'll need, and can support it with the appropriate skills and mindset, you'll have an easier time facing any survival situation that comes your way — whether it's in the Arctic, the desert, or your own home town.


Video: AlfieAesthetics Builds a Pocket Survival Kit

UK-based survivalist AlfieAesthetics is one of our favorite YouTubers because of the way he integrates humor into his teaching. Let's face it — it's a lot less appealing to watch a dry, boring, technical presentation on any subject than one that's fun. And if you're setting aside free time to learn survival skills, you might as well have a good time while you're doing it. Alfie's uploads are infrequent at best, but we can appreciate his quality-over-quantity approach.

In his latest video, Alfie explains the rationale behind each component in his pocket survival kit. We've seen these built into various plastic cases and metal Altoids tins, but he chose a cylindrical capsule that can fit snugly into a pocket (or some other place where the sun don't shine). Its contents cover the most important bases and also include some secondary resources — a cutting tool, fire-starters, water purification, navigation, cordage, tools for fishing or snaring small game, and even antiseptic.

Above: A baggie of chlorine dioxide tablets is “a very suspicious looking set of gear overall, but a real A-class solution to the issue of dehydration.”

Several of the tips he mentions are surprisingly insightful, like adhering a backup striker surface for the stormproof matches on the inside of the capsule, or finding a spool that fits the exact diameter of the capsule and also holds the knife tang in place. True to form, Alfie intersperses dry humor to make the survival skills more entertaining and memorable.

Check out the video below. Warning: there's some not-safe-for-work language in this one.

Hopefully this provides some food for thought for your own miniature survival kit, whether it's stowed in your pocket, pack, or prison wallet.


The Basics of Hydroponics

Rarely do we daydream of less-than-perfect soil. We fantasize about our rural retreat — a picturesque cabin equipped with solar panels. We own a well with pure water, a stocked trout stream just a few paces out the backdoor, and a mature woodland with excellent hunting. We have a milk cow and two stands of honeybees, and every plant in the vegetable garden is green and thriving.

In reality, few locations have garden soil that doesn’t need some adjustment. We’d be lucky if the only requirement is 100 pounds of lime to raise the pH or perhaps organic matter applied to the top. But it’s not always so simple. What if the land on our dream acreage has thin (or nonexistent) topsoil? Maybe we’re too far from a quarry to have reliable access to lime. Maybe the only affordable real estate on the market is reclaimed surface mined land. The land could be rocky, heavily compacted, and not likely to be tillable without a few years of prep work.

Hydroponic production may be the best (or only) solution for growing vegetables in scenarios like this.

According to the United Nations’ Food and Agricultural Organization, global food production will need to increase by 70 percent by 2050 in order to provide for a projected 9.1 billion people. Plus this growth must happen as more and more cropland is lost to urbanization and as tighter regulations are placed on farmers in regards to emissions and environmental impacts.

Hydroponics represents one method by which food production can expand into regions not historically known for their suitability to agriculture. This science can be defined on the most basic level as soilless production. Plant nutrition is delivered via water, and the plants are held in place by inert materials, wire trellising, or other means. Hydroponic growing has a place even if the soil is decent. It can extend the growing season and make protection from severe weather and wildlife more feasible. One of a gardener’s worst enemies is weeds, so an avoidance of weed pressures may be another motivator toward hydroponic production.

What Plants Crave

Above: Lettuce and tomatoes are two crops that do well in hydroponic culture.

No, it's not Brawndo. A plant requires 16 elements for optimal growth, which can be remembered with the jingle, “C. Hopkins Café Mighty Good, Managed by Cousin Como Clark” (C HOPKNS CaFe Mg Mn B CuZn CoMo Cl). Of these, carbon (C), hydrogen (H), and oxygen (O) are supplied by air and water. Nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), sulfur (S), and magnesium (Mg) are macronutrients that the plants require in relatively larger amounts. The remainder — iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), boron (B), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), cobalt (Co), molybdenum (Mo), and chlorine (Cl) — are micronutrients, which plants tend to access through naturally occurring organic matter or amended compost in garden soil.

Above: A float system can work well in a home-scale operation.

A conventional grower usually doesn’t have to think about all these elements. How many are represented in a bag of fertilizer? Only three: N, P, and K. Discolored leaves or other reactions will sometimes reveal a need to add some boron or magnesium, or blossom-end rot on tomatoes or peppers will signal a lack of calcium, but for the most part, a traditional gardener manages the pH, the N, P, and K, and lets nature do the rest.

A hydroponic gardener, in contrast, doesn’t enjoy that luxury and must be mindful that every needed component is present in the water. Furthermore, in systems that recycle the nutrient solution, it’s necessary to consistently monitor against salt buildup or drastic changes in pH.

Above: An investment of less than $30 can provide enough premixed fertilizer to create up to 200 gallons of nutrient solution.

The easiest way for beginners to address nutrition is through the purchase of products specifically formulated for hydroponics. These may be either dissolvable granules or liquids. Some are pre-mixed, and others will have components added in stages. Not just any liquid fertilizer will do, because fertilizers formulated for traditional gardening focus primarily on nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium.

Of course, those who are preparedness-minded may eventually prefer to wean themselves from commercial nutrients in favor of “homebrewed” options. There are a lot of do-it-yourself resources online discussing the solutions that worked in various circumstances. With these as a starting point, you may want to find your own recipe through trial and error, experimenting with nutrient “teas.” Compost, Epsom salts, and various organic fertilizers are examples of ingredients that can contribute the necessary elements to your hydroponic growing. Again, though, expect to do some close monitoring to fine-tune your formula. Be mindful, too, of sanitation and the possibility of splash on your fruits, and especially if you market your produce, adhere to proper Good Agricultural Practices regarding the use of certain organic fertilizers.

Above: The Kratky non-circulating method doesn’t require a lot of equipment.

Hydroponic Myths

While this style of growing can fill a lot of gaps in home food production, it’s not a magic pill. One of the greatest disadvantages is that it requires an initial investment in time and money to construct your system and then a considerable amount of homework and monitoring to keep it functioning properly.

Some mistakenly believe that yields are greater with hydroponic crops in comparison to their conventional, soil-based counterparts, but that’s simply not true. With all things being equal, the plants in a hydroponic system will bear about the same as those in a traditional garden.

Because light requirements don’t change, it’s also untrue that you can space hydroponic vegetables closer than you can in a garden plot. (Spacing plants too closely in either scenario can be an invitation to not only poor production, but also to spread fungal diseases from plant to plant.)

Above: Net pots are useful in several different hydroponic methods.

Taste and nutrition of the final product will be similar between the two systems as well, provided that each plant has access to the required amounts of light, oxygen, nutrients, and water. For any who have been less than impressed by a hydroponic tomato or other vegetable, that could be blamed on a simple missing nutrient.

Growing hydroponically can be rewarding, but it doesn’t require less work than conventional gardening — just different work. No, you won’t have to hoe, plow, and dig, but you’ll need some basic plumbing knowhow, and you may become more of a chemist than you planned to be.

Furthermore, while the commercial hydroponic operations you may have seen are constructed in greenhouses and under artificial light, this doesn’t have to be the case. It’s possible to have a system on your patio or in a south-facing window, where growing can take advantage of natural light and temperatures, following roughly the same growing season as a conventional garden.

Above: Compost provides many micronutrients to gardens and can contribute to the richness of homemade hydroponic nutrients, too.

You can spend as much money as you want on hydroponic gardening (as with most hobbies), but it doesn’t have to be expensive. It’s possible to buy enough equipment for 25 to 30 plants nutrients included) for under $50, provided you use recycled buckets or containers, and quite a few complete kits can be found online in the $100 range.

Which Crops?

Almost any crop can be grown hydroponically, in theory, although maturity days and plant size can make some more challenging than others. For this reason, crops most often seen in hydroponic production systems include herbs, tomatoes, peppers, cucumbers, celery, watercress, and leaf lettuce. A brand-new hydroponic grower would do well to start with one or two of these.

Strawberries can also do very well hydroponically. The advantages include removal of the crop from exposure to soil-borne pests and the labor benefits of picking berries that are elevated above the ground. Hydroponic strawberry production has proven to be a viable method in some arid parts of the world, including desert regions of Israel.

Nutrient Deficiencies

Specific symptoms will result from nutrient deficiencies, making it possible to identify which nutrients should be added to correct these problems. Check the chart below for a primer on which nutrients your crops might need:

The Simplest Method

A technique developed by Dr. B.A. Kratky of the University of Hawaii makes hydroponic growing accessible to more people by removing pumps and electricity from the equation. The “Kratky Method” is a non-circulating system that can be housed in a plastic bucket or tote.

“The suspended pot, non-circulating hydroponic method is a convenient way to grow short-term vegetables like lettuce and pak-choi,” Dr. Kratky explains, “because a small tank containing 1 to 2 gallons per plant only needs to be filled with nutrient solution (water plus fertilizer) at transplanting time and no additional effort is needed until harvest.”

With this method, plants are placed in a “net pot” and then suspended above the nutrient solution. As the liquid is used up, the roots reach further. The humid air between the water and the pot provides for oxygen exchange in the roots. For fast-maturing crops, the water and nutrients initially loaded will be sufficient to carry the crop through to harvest.

Above: Crops grown hydroponically are physiologically no different than crops grown in soil.

The first step to employing non-circulating hydroponics is to collect containers with lids — 5-gallon buckets and storage totes are fine. Delis and bakeries often have used plastic buckets they’re willing to part with.

Net pots and some type of sterile medium will be needed to keep the plants upright and suspended in the solution. Clay pellets, gravel, rockwool, vermiculite, perlite, sand, or packing peanuts are some commonly used growing media. I recently ordered 50 2-inch net pots and a bag of clay pellets for just over $20.

Use a hole saw of the same diameter as your net pots to make one to four holes in the lid of your bucket.

Next, add water and nutrient to make a solution for your crop, but take care to leave an air gap between the water level and the bottom of the lid where your pots are placed.

Above: Crops grown in a suspended pot, non-circulating system can be quite portable.

The crop should have a short enough maturity that it’s ready for harvest by the time the solution is 10 percent of its starting level. Lettuce and bok choy, for instance, should do well in 5-gallon containers. Longer-term vegetables should be grown in larger containers, or a secondary tank can keep levels topped off with the use of a float valve.

A Kratky system can also be quite portable, allowing growers to set their buckets into a garage if a late frost is forecast, or to move them into and out of direct sunlight as needed.

Other Methods

Above: The nutrient film technique recirculates the nutrient solution so that roots sit in a constant flow.

Another growing method common in both commercial and home-scale hydroponic production is the nutrient film technique (NFT). Here, a constant flow of nutrient solution is circulated through a plastic-lined trough or enclosed channel via a pump and reservoir. The plant roots remain in the flow. The plants themselves may be supported via an overhead trellising system, or they may be held in place by net pots, rockwool, or other media. PVC pipe or guttering can work in a home system, with an ideal slope of a half inch drop every 15 feet.

Because the nutrient is recirculated, water quality can become a concern, and it’s usually necessary to completely change the solution periodically.

Above: Tobacco transplants begun in float beds.

Float systems are another type of hydroponics that are relatively simple for a home grower to grasp. In these, rafts made of Styrofoam hold the plants and float directly on the nutrient solution. Since there’s no air space between the solution and the raft, some type of bubbler is needed in the reservoir to supply oxygen to the roots.

This system is often used by tobacco farmers to start their transplants, and many of these systems have been adapted over the past decade to start other transplants, such as tomatoes, pepper, and even corn. The transplants that are started hydroponically are then grown in natural soil.

Above: Tomato seedings begun in rockwool cubes quickly extend their feeder roots into the solution when placed in a nutrient film technique system.

In the aeration method, the nutrient solution is misted onto the roots, often from within an A-framed Styrofoam structure into which the plants are placed. Excess solution runs back into a reservoir and is recycled.

Yet another style of hydroponics is bag culture, where plants are grown in polyethylene bags filled with a medium-like vermiculite or peat. Capillary tubes that run from a main nutrient supply line are inserted into each bag, delivering the nutrients. (In one university demonstration, bag culture tomato plants grew so heavy that they damaged the steel frame of the greenhouse to which they were trellised!)

What About Aquaponics?

Above: Aquaponics will require a lot of inputs to keep both plants and fish healthy.

The concept behind aquaponics is that edible tilapia (or other fish species) are grown in large tanks, and their waste water is cycled through the hydroponic vegetables. The nutrient film technique is often used in these systems. In theory, the fish waste supplies the nutrient needs of the plants, while the plants themselves filter the water before it’s recirculated back into the fish tanks. The reality is that both plants and fish will require closer monitoring than in standalone aquaculture or hydroponic systems. Root diseases can be exacerbated due to an overabundance of organic matter in the water, and plants don’t actually “clean” out all elements that can harm the fish.

Above: Aquaponics is an interesting concept, but one that can be very challenging to master.

However, people have merged the two systems, and enterprising homesteaders who want a challenge may consider taking on an aquaponics project as a means to provide both vegetables and protein. Just keep in mind that a lot more management (and patience) will be needed.

Conclusion

Above: Lettuce in an NFT system.

Hydroponic growing isn’t for everyone. It can be tricky to master the chemistry of nutrition and the nuances of plumbing for plants. But for those with poor soil, or who live in places where the deer and rabbits eat better than the people, it can be a viable option. Furthermore, employing both conventional and hydroponic growing can make a lot of sense, with your corn, beans, and potatoes in the earth, but bok choy and celery in Kratky buckets beside the garage, where you can watch them develop beyond the groundhogs’ comfort zones.

If this is a method that captures your imagination, you can start on the most basic level now to add some variety to your gardening. By next season, who knows? Perhaps a full-blown nutrient film technique system will become part of your daydreams.

About the Author

Phillip Meeks is an agriculture and natural resources educator originally from Tennessee, but now based in the mountains of Southwest Virginia. He likes to spend his weekends hiking, gardening, beekeeping, fishing, and mushroom hunting.

More From Issue 32

Don’t miss essential survival insights—sign up for Recoil Offgrid's free newsletter today!

Read articles from the next issue of Recoil Offgrid: Issue 33

Read articles from the previous issue of Recoil Offgrid: Issue 31

Check out our other publications on the web: Recoil | Gun Digest | Blade | RecoilTV | RECOILtv (YouTube)

Editor's Note: This article has been modified from its original version for the web.


Option Gray: Door Considerations for Home Security

Nobody wants to become the victim of a burglary, so home security is something we've all considered to some degree. But ask yourself this: have you put more effort into your house's security than a determined criminal would put into gaining entry? If you're unsure, then it's likely that a burglar could break into your home with relative ease — it happens more than a million times every year. This security camera footage shows just how easy it can be:

Even with the large glass panel that's practically begging to be broken, the burglar doesn't bother — he's able to breach the front door effortlessly with a single kick.

Fortunately, there are many simple steps that can be taken to improve your home security. In the following article, Cody Martin of OptionGray.com shares a few options for reinforcing the exterior doors to your house. Consider some of these tips next time you evaluate your vulnerability to home invasion.


When it comes to home security, we can sometimes become bogged down with all the things we can do to improve the security and sanctity of our homes. This can lead to paralysis, which results in nothing being done at all. However, if we take a methodical approach and break up home security into sections which can be tackled one at a time, we are much more likely to make improvements to our current situation.

To get things started we are going to take a look at entrances, more specifically doors. For the sake of this article, we will define an entrance as anything which would allow access into our home. This can include but is not limited to doors, windows, garages, etc. All of these provide interior access and should be treated as such. It’s easy to assign importance, but when that happens, certain entrances get all the attention while others are overlooked. Let’s take a look at the basics of security in relation to entrances and hopefully you can find a few takeaways to improve your home security.

The first thing people think of in terms of entrances are doors. Doors are the most common form of gaining legal access into a dwelling and it makes sense they get the most attention. Unfortunately, very little thought is actually put into the security aspects of doors when compared to their aesthetics or how they look.

Construction
So, what is the first consideration we should look at? I would say it’s the construction of your doors. The simplest way to look at it is whether or not your door is solid wood or solid metal. Simply put, solid-core doors are harder to break and harder to kick in. Avoid hollow core doors at all cost. They are easy to defeat and offer little to no protection against a determined adversary.

Weak hollow-core doors may be a vulnerability, despite the strength of the lock and frame.

Features
You should also try to choose a door with no glass/windows in the design and you should make sure there are no windows within arms reach of the lock. You want to avoid the possibility of someone knocking out a window, reaching through, and unlocking the door. To compensate for not having a window to view visitors, invest in a wide angle peephole. It doesn't do you any good to have a secure door if you have to open it up to see who is ringing the bell.

Reinforcement
Most exterior doors are installed to swing inwards, meaning the hinges are more than likely on the inside of the structure. This prevents easy hinge pin removal. Ideally, you should also be using Grade 1 deadbolts (Grade 2 will also work), 1” long throw bolts, and make sure your strike plates are reinforced with a minimum of 3” long wood screws. I would recommend installing a reinforced strike box and strike plate in addition to the upgraded deadbolt.

A few examples of reinforced strike plates.

For added peace of mind you can always install a complete door reinforcement kit, which reinforces the door jam, hinges, and deadbolt/doorknob areas. I have never used one of these kits, but they have received rave reviews and they look pretty good through testing.

Another area of concern is the rear door. Rear doors oftentimes contain a window which allows easy access for a burglar. One way to mitigate this concern is to use a double cylinder dead bolt which requires a key to lock/unlock on both sides of the door. A downside to this is if you are in a situation where you need to make a hasty escape out the rear door. You may not have time to locate and use a key to get out. This is something to keep in mind.

Door Access Points
Pet doors, mail slots, etc., are also weak points in your home security system. Again, you want to avoid any method of access which would allow someone to reach through, crawl through, or provide access for a burglary tool. Here is a video of a burglar crawling through a dog door to gain access to a home:

Externals
In addition, there are a couple of external features directly related to the security of your doors which you can take advantage of. Make sure you have sufficient lighting covering all of your entrance doors. Lighting can act as a great deterrent in preventing crime or at a minimum displacing crime. If they are determined to commit a burglary you might as well send them on to an easier target. In addition to the lighting, make sure all your vegetation and landscaping is cleared enough to remove any potential hiding places. If your door is easily seen from the street you can benefit from passive surveillance from general traffic passing through the area.

The reality is with very little effort you can greatly reduce the likelihood of someone gaining access through your doors. With that mind, a deliberate burglar may move on to another method of entry if the door proves too difficult. We will discuss those in a future article. In the mean time, get to work on those doors and start chipping away at your home security deficiencies.


Review: Rynoskin Total Insect Protection Clothing

Harsh environmental conditions such as driving rain, heat, or cold can all sap our strength when working in the outdoors, but few things have the ability to challenge our focus and health quite like stinging and biting insects. Trying to maintain a pace count while dead reckoning a course through the woods and simultaneously slapping your ears every few seconds to ward off mosquitoes is trying at best, and at worst, carries the risk of vector-borne illness transmission.

Photo: DVIDS / Petty Officer 3rd Class William Phillips

When you finally reach your destination, throw your pack down, and start to strip off some sweaty clothing only to find ticks embedded in your skin, that also has a way of immediately reducing the fun factor. Just ask survivalist Megan Hine, who we interviewed in Issue 22, how debilitating it was to battle Lyme disease. The point is that there are items out there, aside from insect repellent, which can serve as a bulwark against these clandestine creatures.

Enter the Rynoskin line of undergarments. Intended to be worn underneath clothing, it’s designed to keep mosquitoes, ticks, and other bugs off of your skin. Utilizing a superfine mesh of blended
nylon/Lycra fabrics, it remains breathable without allowing bugs like ticks, chiggers, no-see-ums, and mosquitoes to bite you through the weave — and without the use of chemicals. Conceptually, it’s similar to this author’s experience swimming or waterskiing in jellyfish-infested waters when we’d wear pantyhose to keep from getting stung. Stop laughing; Navy SEALs in Vietnam would actually sometimes wear pantyhose to prevent leeches from latching onto their skin. It also helped reduce friction and blisters.

Testing the Claims

When we first opened the boxes of Rynoskin and started reading the instructions, we had our doubts. We’re supposed to wear this stuff underneath our clothing? No bother during cooler weather, when you might be wearing insulating layers anyway. But what about in the heat and humidity? “This body suit is so comfortable that the user will forget that they’re wearing it,” claims the marketing brochure. This sounded like just one more load of marketing BS to us, and it wouldn’t be the first or the hundredth time we’ve been let down by similar claims.

With temperatures in the high 80s F and high humidity, we reluctantly stripped down and layered back up with a pair of Rynoskin leggings under our cotton BDU pants, and a Rynoskin top under our T-shirt. Then, we got to work — and that’s when the magic happened. After the first 10 to 15 minutes of feeling hyper-vigilant, trying to figure out if anything was chafing (it wasn’t), and just generally getting used to wearing undergarment layers in hot weather, we literally did forget we had them on. The material is simply as breathable and incredibly effective at wicking sweat as it claimed to be. Hell, it actually felt better with the material underneath. The hype, apparently, is real.

We weren’t in a tick-prone environment, so we can’t comment on the effectiveness of the garment with that particular bug, but we can definitely confirm it kept the mosquitos off our skin in muggy western Florida. As the marketing materials say, with the Rynoskin underneath, you can get by with just a cotton T-shirt on top. Pretty impressive, considering that we’ve had some mosquitoes able to bite us through our blue jeans.

Garments and Fitment

Besides the long-sleeve top and leggings, Rynoskin also offers a face hood, socks, and gloves to ensure nearly 100-percent coverage of your body. If you’re just dealing with mosquitoes or other flying insects, it shouldn’t be a problem to leave the socks at home, but the usefulness for areas with ticks and chiggers is obvious.

The hood, admittedly, looks a bit like a 1970s Russian cosmonaut load-out. However, if it means keeping bugs off of your neck and out of your ears, sometimes you have to sacrifice style for practicality. In a similar manner, the gloves seem a bit much, but after your first time coming back from the woods with tiny lumps and red marks all over your hands from bug bites, you might reconsider just like we did. It can be tough to just smear your hands and face with bug repellent, especially the really powerful and effective sprays. Rubbing your eyes and getting repellent in them can burn and cause you to tear up.

When we used the gloves, they didn’t seem to fit our fingers very well. We had to do a lot of pulling, and sometimes we were afraid of tearing the fabric by trying to pull the finger sleeves down over our fingers to get a tight fit. We could, however, use our smartphones, with a little bit of difficulty. We ended up having to pull the fabric around our “swiping” index finger taught by pulling with our other hand, which isn’t exactly an ideal situation, but still a functional workaround. It also helps to start by pulling the sleeves of the gloves all the way back on your forearm before starting to mess with the fingers.

If you’re going for full protection, plan to “shingle” the products from your feet up to your head. Basically, the lower layers should be lapped on top of the upper layers. In other words, tuck your face hood down into the turtleneck shirt so that the turtleneck is over the hood. Then, tuck the shirt down into the pants so that the waistband of the pants laps on top of the shirt, and so on. This way, for example, if an insect is crawling up your legs it won’t be able to crawl underneath your shirt when it gets to your waist.

Final Thoughts

We like the fact that these fabrics are chemical-free for several reasons. First, there’s nothing that’ll wash out of the clothes after 10 or 20 washes and cause the garments to lose their effectiveness over time. Second, if it means that we can carry less bug repellent and use less chemicals on our skin in the long-term, we’ll take that option all day long.

Wearing a traditional mosquito netting head cover is effective, but has downsides.

For similarly useful alternatives, we’ve also used mosquito-netting covers on our heads as well as mosquito-netting jackets. These products are inexpensive, but they’re also very effective at what they do. The main downside for us was that the head covers made it much more difficult to see what we were doing or where we were walking, especially when trying to stick to a faint trail in low-light conditions. Similarly, the netting jackets always seemed to interfere with gear, such as backpacks or rifle slings, by snagging easily or getting torn by brush.

We like the fact that the Rynoskin goes underneath our clothing, since we’re able to maintain 100-percent functionality with our existing gear and clothing systems we’re already used to wearing. The undergarment will last longer because it’s protected under your clothing, plus it’s machine-washable and dryable without shrinking (we verified this at home).

Long story short? Hot or cold, if you work in buggy environments and haven’t tried this gear yet, there’s just no reason to wait any longer. The price point is affordable for most people, the products are made in the United States, and best of all, the products actually live up to their promises. We’re sold.

Rynoskin Specifications

Colors
Various

MSRP

  • Total shirt: $46
  • Total pants: $46
  • Total hood: $23
  • Total gloves: $23
  • Total socks: $23

URL
www.rynoskin.com

About The Author

Andrew Schrader is a licensed professional engineer and serves on the State of Florida’s Urban Search and Rescue (USAR) Task Force. His company, Recon Response Engineering LLC, educates firefighters and search-and-rescue teams on the subject of urban search and rescue and building collapse. Most recently, he was deployed to the Florida Panhandle to support rescue operations following Hurricane Michael. www.reconresponse.com

More From Issue 32

Don’t miss essential survival insights—sign up for Recoil Offgrid's free newsletter today!

Read articles from the next issue of Recoil Offgrid: Issue 33

Read articles from the previous issue of Recoil Offgrid: Issue 31

Check out our other publications on the web: Recoil | Gun Digest | Blade | RecoilTV | RECOILtv (YouTube)

Editor's Note: This article has been modified from its original version for the web.


New: TOPS Knives Fieldcraft 3.5

We recently returned from Blade Show, an event that serves as a venue for knife manufacturers to show off their newest products. One such item came from TOPS Knives — it's new, but also familiar. The TOPS Fieldcraft 3.5 is a scaled-down version of the popular Brothers of Bushcraft (B.O.B.) Fieldcraft, an outdoor-oriented fixed blade knife we previously reviewed and have used frequently.

Top: the new Fieldcraft 3.5. Bottom: the original Fieldcraft.

The original B.O.B. Fieldcraft has been one of TOPS' best-selling designs, as well as one of our favorites from the company. Its 4.5-inch, 1095 high-carbon steel blade features a modified Scandi grind that's excellent for camping, hunting, bushcraft, or survival tasks. However, some users prefer a smaller and lighter knife, especially if they're also carrying an ax or saw for heavy-duty tasks. TOPS has responded to these users by releasing the Fieldcraft 3.5.

Technically, the Fieldcraft 3.5 has a 3-5/8-inch blade, but “Fieldcraft 3.625” would've been a bit awkward as a name. It still has the same 1095 steel construction, modified Scandi grind, black traction coating, and canvas micarta handle scales as its big brother. The steel is slightly slimmer at 0.16 inches thick (the original was 0.19) and has a flush-ground tang instead of the hammer pommel present on the full-size model. Weight is 5.5 ounces, down from the original's 9.6 ounces.

MSRP for the new TOPS Fieldcraft 3.5 is $145, and this includes a Kydex sheath with rotating spring steel belt clip. Unlike the original Fieldcraft, this smaller knife doesn't come with a sheath-mounted ferro rod, but we can understand the reasoning behind this given the goal of reducing size and weight. For more information on the Fieldcraft 3.5, go to TOPSKnives.com.

Read More

Don’t miss essential survival insights—sign up for Recoil Offgrid's free newsletter today!

Check out our other publications on the web: Recoil | Gun Digest | Blade | RecoilTV | RECOILtv (YouTube)


Virtual Survival: 5 Survival Video Game Reviews

Images courtesy of Steam and the developers

You’ ll rot your brain! That’s a waste of time. Can’t you find something better to do? If you ever played video games as a kid, you may have heard statements like these from parents or other adults who saw no value in that particular pastime. Admittedly, many games are intended solely as a source of entertainment — expertise at rescuing the Mushroom Kingdom’s princess doesn’t translate well to the real world. However, assuming that we can’t learn anything worthwhile from video games is as shortsighted as saying the same about movies, television, or books. In fact, the interactive nature of this medium can be an extremely valuable training tool, as we’ve seen from the widespread use of simulators in various technical fields.

As survivalists, we should consider all possible avenues to strengthen our minds and learn new skills. Video games can offer opportunities for both. Just as a survival-oriented novel or film — or our own What If? column — can leave you contemplating how you’d approach a disaster scenario, survival games can help us become more adept at planning, problem-solving, and organization. You might also see a tool or technique you hadn’t considered before, resulting in motivation to study it later, or hone your ability to communicate under pressure during a multiplayer session. You could even utilize video games as a form of confined environment recreation if you’re locked down and going a little stir crazy — think 10 Cloverfield Lane.

There’s no substitute for practicing survival skills in real life, but there are times when that’s not feasible. Most of us can’t afford to simulate being marooned on a desert island, stranded on a frigid mountain peak, or under attack by a hostile force in an urban wasteland. And even if we could, there’s no respawn if you’re injured or killed while living out these scenarios. Video games allow us to instantly jump into any one of these storylines, exploring and experimenting without lasting consequences.

We selected five survival-oriented games and evaluated them based on their value as training tools, as well as how this is balanced with enjoyment and replayability. Each game features varying degrees of fantasy and creative license — don’t expect a hard-core simulation of survival, because you still can’t feel the physical effects of a life-and-death situation through your controller. That said, these games can be a lot of fun and — contrary to what those cynical adults said — far from a waste of time.

Dying Light (Enhanced Edition)

Publisher
Techland

Platforms
Microsoft Windows, Mac OS, Linux, PlayStation 4, XBOX One

Players
1-4

Price as Tested
$60

URL
www.dyinglightgame.com

Notes
This game takes place in Harran, a fictional Middle Eastern coastal city with terrain ranging from towering skyscrapers to claustrophobic tunnels. Harran has been quarantined after a viral outbreak turned most of its residents into zombie-like mutants, forcing the remaining survivors to go into hiding. You play as Kyle Crane, an undercover agent inserted into the city on a mission to retrieve a topsecret file for his employer, the Global Relief Effort (GRE). In addition to hordes of shambling infected filling the abandoned streets, you face fast-moving “virals” as well as heavily armed bandits. A continuous day-night cycle ramps up difficulty after sunset, when more powerful and aggressive enemies come out to hunt.

Dying Light’s free-running parkour system encourages the player to move quickly through Harran, vaulting over obstacles and scaling buildings to avoid enemies. Getting bogged down or cornered is often a death sentence. There’s also an extensive crafting mechanic in which players are encouraged to scavenge for food and resources throughout the abandoned city. Found items can be combined in a variety of ways to construct first aid kits, weapons, and weapon upgrades — for example, the Wrench Kiss is a heavy pipe wrench wrapped in barbed wire with a blade fastened to the leading edge. As the game progresses, you’ll start to obtain handguns, shotguns, and full-auto rifles, but ammo scarcity means you must use every round carefully.

Numerous downloadable updates have kept the game fresh since its release in 2015, including a large expansion called The Following (included in the Enhanced Edition) that adds new map areas, drivable vehicles, and missions. There’s also an upcoming sequel, Dying Light 2, which was announced in mid-2018 and is currently in development.

Pros:

  • Excellent co-op gameplay lets you team up with up to four friends, working together to scavenge, defend each other, and complete missions.
  • Situational awareness is critical. If you stop moving or get distracted, it’s easy to get overwhelmed, especially at night.
  • Huge variety of weapons — each must be repaired over time, and can be upgraded or modified.

Cons:

  • Using your parkour skills to make death-defying leaps like post-apocalyptic Spiderman is a lot of fun. In a real disaster, it’d leave you exhausted, injured, and/or dead.
  • If you’re looking for immersive realism, the game’s often-cheesy dialogue, sci-fi enemies, and exaggerated weapons won’t appeal to you.

Raft

Publisher
RedBeet Interactive

Platforms
Microsoft Windows, Mac OS, Linux

Players
1-8 is recommended, although there’s no hard limit

Price as Tested
$20

URL
www.raft-game.com

Notes
Water, water everywhere, but not a drop to drink. Also, you have no food or shelter and a giant shark keeps trying to kill you.

In Raft, you’re adrift on an endless ocean with no supplies except what you find floating on the surface. The good news is that there’s no shortage of junk being carried by the current — enough
barrels, plastic jugs, wood planks, and other debris to give a Greenpeace member an aneurysm. The bad news is that you’ll need to retrieve the junk before it floats away, either by swimming out to grab it or by reeling it in using an improvised grappling hook. The former option is dangerous, since you’re likely to get attacked by the shark or drift too far from your raft. Using the grappling hook lets you retrieve supplies safely, but this takes careful timing and precision to cast it in the right spot. At first, this can be annoying, as many items slip from your grasp like prizes from an arcade claw machine. With practice, it gets easier.

The raw materials you collect from the ocean surface are used to build tools, such as a hammer to expand your raft, a spear to temporarily deter the shark, and a fishing pole. Fish you catch — and other food you find inexplicably floating in barrels, such as potatoes and beets — must be eaten periodically to keep your nutrition bar from dropping to zero. Making a fire and cooking these items increases their nutritional value. You also need to quench your thirst, but seawater predictably hurts you if you consume it, so you’ll need to build a purifier ASAP. Eventually, you can grow your raft into an expansive multi-level houseboat, and play online with friends to divide and conquer survival tasks.

Pros:

  • Water purification is surprisingly realistic. Your character boils seawater and condenses the vapor in an improvised still.
  • This “Early Access” game is affordable and receives frequent updates, one of which added large islands where you can anchor your raft and search for supplies.

Cons:

  • After a while, trying to stave off dehydration, starvation, and the irritating shark that constantly pops up to rip your raft to shreds starts feeling more tedious than fun.
  • The construction system is sometimes illogical — build a planter from planks and rope, and soil magically appears so you can grow crops.

Rust

Publisher
Facepunch Studios

Platforms
Microsoft Windows, Mac OS

Players
Up to 300, depending on the server you join

Price as Tested
$35

URL
rust.facepunch.com

Notes
Survival has a steep learning curve, and so does Rust. The game has no story, no dialogue, and no missions. Your character is an anonymous, completely naked man or woman who never speaks. You’re dropped unceremoniously into a huge, procedurally generated map with nothing but a rock and a torch, and your only goal is to thrive in the environment without starving or getting killed by exposure, predators, hostile non-player characters, or other humans. You’ll need to forage for food and fresh water, collect resources, and build your way out of the stone age. With enough time and patience, your rock can be replaced by a stone axe, then a sword and bow. Sooner or later you’ll get an improvised shotgun, explosives, machine guns, and rocket launchers. You can don armor, build a defensible compound, decorate your home, start a garden, and even pick up hobbies like playing a fully functional guitar (yes, really).

Rust is exclusively multiplayer, so you’ll be occupying the same map as dozens or hundreds of other players — each might choose to befriend you, ignore you, or hunt you down. Unsurprisingly, most choose the third play style. This probably sounds harsh, and that’s by design. The developers have said they wanted to create a world where players could behave any way they choose — a sort of a virtual Lord of the Flies. You’re free to decide to trust others and work together, or attempt to kill everyone you meet on sight before looting (or even eating) their corpses. Facepunch Studios founder Garry Newman wrote, “You should be fearful of others. That is the whole point. If you’re sick of getting killed — start a town. Build town walls… set up trip wires and alarms. Watch each other’s back.”

Pros:

  • You’ll immediately feel the punishing difficulty of survival, and understand that the responsibility to make it easier is yours alone. If you expect to survive, you’d better get to work.
  • Just like in real life, you have total freedom to help others or stab them in the back for your own gain. This brings a psychological element and makes every alliance a tentative one.

Cons:

  • Gameplay is often comical in its ruthlessness, with a learning curve that’s more like a brick wall. The first time we played, we unluckily spawned next to a wolf that ran over and killed us within 30 seconds. It didn’t take long after that to come across some of the countless hostile players with advanced gear who gleefully annihilate the defenseless.

Stranded Deep

Publisher
Beam Team Games

Platforms
Microsoft Windows, Mac OS, Linux (PS4 and XBOX One releases are planned, but not available at time of publication)

Players
1

Price as Tested
$15

URL
beamteamgames.com/stranded-deep

Notes
Unlike the previous games in this article, Stranded Deep is exclusively a single-player experience. Although there’s some indication that co-op functionality might be included in a future update, we played this game solo, and we’re glad we did — it strongly emphasizes the feeling of isolation.

The game starts with a nighttime plane crash that dumps you somewhere in the Pacific Ocean, not unlike the movie Cast Away. After emerging from the wreckage, you clamber into an inflatable life raft and paddle your way to a tiny desert island. The game world is procedurally generated, meaning that every player will end up with a different environment. Throughout the game, you’ll need to monitor hunger, thirst, and tiredness via status bars on your wristwatch.

Aside from anything you find in your raft or  washed up on shore, all items must be crafted from the world around you. Start by making a stone tool from a rock fragment, combine it with cordage from fibrous leaves and a stick to make a crude axe, and chop down some palm trees. This yields wood for a campfire, fronds to make a shelter, and coconuts. You can drink coconut water to stay hydrated, but just like in real life, it’s a natural diuretic that will make you sick if you drink too much. Make a still to produce fresh water. Spear some crabs and cook the meat by holding it over a fire. There’s a huge variety of items in Stranded Deep, and each has a purpose, if not several possible uses. Eventually, you can make a raft and sail to a new island, explore shipwrecks, construct buildings, and start farming.

Pros:

  • Great sense of immersion — the environment feels both tranquil and merciless, much like it would on a real desert island.
  • Crafting system is well thought out and surprisingly realistic. Your island’s resources will soon be depleted. When that time comes, you’d better be prepared to make the dangerous voyage to a new island.

Cons:

  • We appreciate that inventory space is limited to a realistic level, but this also means you’ll constantly be picking up, dropping, and moving around items to manage that limited inventory.
  • This is an “Early Access” game that’s still in development, and its controls and gameplay mechanics often feel less polished than a retail release. Also, the future of PS4 and XBOX versions is uncertain after the sudden closure of publisher Telltale Games in 2018.

The Long Dark

Publisher
Hinterland Studio

Platforms
Microsoft Windows, Mac OS, Linux, PlayStation 4, XBOX One (Nintendo Switch release TBD)

Players
1

Price as Tested
$30

URL
www.thelongdark.com

Notes
“Preparation and self-control are vital to your survival.” This lesson from The Long Dark’s first segment is reinforced through every aspect of the game. Two main modes are available, an episodic Story Mode and an open-ended Survival Mode; both are single-player only.

The story takes place in the “quiet apocalypse” following a massive geomagnetic storm that has wiped out all technology. You begin as Will McKenzie, a bush pilot whose small plane crashes in the frozen Canadian wilderness as a result of this global disaster. Dr. Astrid Greenwood, your ex-wife, had persuaded you to fly her out to treat a patient in a remote village, but she’s nowhere to be found after the crash. Injured by the hard landing and suffering from the onset of hypothermia, you must take shelter in a cave, start a fire to raise your core temperature, and treat your injuries to stop the bleeding. Your character’s vitals — thirst, hunger, fatigue, and body temperature — must be constantly monitored and maintained. Exposure is a continuous risk, with varying weather directly impacting your character as you scrounge up resources. You eventually need to leave your cave and follow clues to find out what happened to Astrid. This story has yet to be completed — two of the five episodes are currently available, with no concrete release date set for the third.

Despite its many realistic elements, The Long Dark is about more than pure survival. It’s also a cinematic experience with characters you grow close to and a story you become invested in. We only wish its story was complete and ready to play, but as in real survival situations, sometimes you have to exercise self-control and wait patiently.

Pros:

  • Beautiful, haunting soundtrack, unique art style, and compelling voice acting pull you into the story
  • Survival mechanics often surprised us — starting a fire sometimes fails, strong wind can blow out your torch, and hunting a rabbit requires you to snap its neck in a visceral manner
  • Manage your time wisely, because food can burn and water can boil away if left unattended. Stats drop as you sleep, and your fire will go out before morning if you didn’t add enough fuel.

Cons:

  • At time of publication, two of the five planned story episodes have been released. Episode Three was promised in December 2018 but got pushed back, with no precise ETA given.
  • You’re forced to melt snow and then boil the water for 20 in-game minutes before you can drink it, perpetuating the “minimum boiling time” misconception.

For a bonus survival-oriented game review, check out our recent web-exclusive article about Tom Clancy's The Division 2.

More From Issue 32

Don’t miss essential survival insights—sign up for Recoil Offgrid's free newsletter today!

Read articles from the next issue of Recoil Offgrid: Issue 33

Read articles from the previous issue of Recoil Offgrid: Issue 31

Check out our other publications on the web: Recoil | Gun Digest | Blade | RecoilTV | RECOILtv (YouTube)

Editor's Note: This article has been modified from its original version for the web.


Live Coverage: Blade Show 2019

This weekend, we're on-site at the Cobb Galleria Centre in Atlanta, GA for Blade Show 2019 — the world's largest annual knife show. We've been attending Blade Show for several years now, and we can attest that there's no better place to be for anyone who's into knives, edged weapons, and EDC tools. The show started yesterday, June 7th, and continues through Sunday, June 9th.

Walking the aisles at Blade Show, you'll find all the big-name production knife companies in the industry, such as Spyderco, CRKT, Kershaw, Zero Tolerance, Emerson, and Microtech. There are also numerous mid-tech and custom makers offering knives that range from simple and practical to ornate and exotic. Blade Show isn't just limited to pocket knives, either — there are also countless fixed blades, swords, hatchets, pocket tools, tactical pens, flashlights, and much more. Last year, we even found a high-end handmade pizza cutter (seriously).

Unlike many of the industry-exclusive trade shows we visit, Blade Show is open to the public. This means that you can browse through the new models and buy some knives right there on the show floor. The show also caters to knifemakers, with booths full of tools and raw materials including various types of metal, wood, leather, bone, and composite. There are Blade University classes where you can learn about knifemaking and use, and a high-intensity cutting competition in the outdoor pavilion.

Show admission is $25 for one day, or $55 for the whole weekend. However, we understand that many of you won't be able to make it to Georgia to attend, so we'll be posting photos and videos in the gallery at the end of this post.

To see Blade Show 2019 through our eyes, follow @recoiloffgridmagazine on Instagram or check out the gallery below (you may need to click “load more” to refresh the latest posts). If you’re near Atlanta and interested in attending the show this weekend, go to BladeShow.com for ticketing info.